If the Lindsay Clancy jury is really 11-1* for full acquittal, the state shouldn’t re-try her after a mistrial. That’s an expensive proposition
Posted on September 4, 2026 at 12:20:46 PM by brick
for a very low likelihood of conviction. It’s not like they’re going to find a great pool of jurors who haven’t heard about the case now that it’s all over TV and become a major fault line on social media.
* Supposedly the foreperson put the vote count in a note causing the judge the instruct the foreperson not to put the vote count in notes.
Back to the board
Thread:
-
If the Lindsay Clancy jury is really 11-1* for full acquittal, the state shouldn’t re-try her after a mistrial. That’s an expensive proposition
- By brick
September 4, 2026 at 12:20:46 PM
Log in to reply.