Rules:

Rule 1.
Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
Don't be a Tom Izzo.

Admins - Rich, BBA, Nikos
Ceremonial Moderator - the wino
Moderator Emeritus - Beave
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Craig

📌 🏈 Michigan at Minnesota*
📌 To register, email victardgoblue@gmail *

The Victors

MGoBlog || UMHoops || BB90 || Scores || Cards || Chat || HOF || Games

Post a New Message

Home | Search | Login | Register | Settings

of course you didn't say it was over, you just said it was unlikely to be successful because of what you saw in game 1

Posted on September 6, 2026 at 08:28:21 AM by DoctorD

I'm saying it's just a bit early to be trying to draw the conclusion.

Back to the board

Thread:

Things may work out, who knows? But based on last night, the Whitt era looks unlikely to be successful. Jim leaving didn’t kill us. Jim not leaving us with a viable successor on staff did. (m) - By Eric September 6, 2026 at 08:23:28 AM
- I’m sure the heat is on Whitt to make BU work. He’s likely stuck between a rock and hard place. We are going to see what kind of stones he has in a new place w few friends and a hard choice to make* - By hambone September 6, 2026 at 08:37:26 AM
- judging the Whitt era after a single game seems as likely to be accurate as judging last night's game after the first drive* - By DoctorD September 6, 2026 at 08:24:21 AM
  - ^this^* - By kccambo September 6, 2026 at 08:33:48 AM
  - I didn’t say it was over. I said more likely than not will be unsuccessful. After what you saw last night, do you think the preponderance of evidence supports a different conclusion, counselor?* - By Eric September 6, 2026 at 08:26:57 AM
    - of course you didn't say it was over, you just said it was unlikely to be successful because of what you saw in game 1 - By DoctorD September 6, 2026 at 08:28:21 AM

Log in to reply.

Probation ends …