i read Brian’s. That said UFR for a play must have two things — a) the context of why the play was called and b) at the most, 3 reasons why the play succeeded. hopefully explained with as minimal points as possible
Posted on September 10, 2026 at 02:18:15 PM by 6p
a) can be something like
- team has weakness defending this stuff.. so they ran
- they saw this look previously and wanted to take advantage
- good time for a throw to JJ
etc
b) should be
“1. rhino whiffs block
2. Bryce throws to a WR covered by 4 people”
etc
Back to the board
Thread:
-
Seems like the board is mostly over UFRs, barely any discussion, few years ago would have been a couple dozen posts*
- By Daytripper
September 10, 2026 at 02:00:52 PM
-
Still a great site, but the trajectory of the program has been down since they let Harbaugh leave*
- By mtb
September 10, 2026 at 04:03:54 PM
-
i read Brian’s. That said UFR for a play must have two things — a) the context of why the play was called and b) at the most, 3 reasons why the play succeeded. hopefully explained with as minimal points as possible
- By 6p
September 10, 2026 at 02:18:15 PM
-
I’ve come to the conclusion that they are semi interesting reads, but both Seth and Brian are at best medium ball knowers. They analyses don’t always align with more educated individuals who do film breakdowns.*
- By WOK
September 10, 2026 at 02:14:45 PM
-
MGoBlog used to be the only place to get sophisticated analysis so you dealt with the annoying personalities...
- By Poster P
September 10, 2026 at 02:14:29 PM
-
The MGoRoundTable was pretty bleak*
- By cp
September 10, 2026 at 02:13:08 PM
-
Seth’s are generally long slogs and very Sethy, so yeah, I’ve cooled on them***
- By Craig
September 10, 2026 at 02:11:04 PM
-
I don't have time to read the whole thing, but skim it. Seth can't help himself when it comes to Wink.**
- By dnvrblue
September 10, 2026 at 02:09:45 PM
-
i still read Brian's. Seth seems to just be looking to justify his pre-formed opinions*
- By Ronti
September 10, 2026 at 02:09:45 PM
Log in to reply.