Rules:
  1. Rule 1.
  2. Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
  3. Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
  4. Don't be a Tom Izzo.

Admins - Rich, BBA, Nikos
Ceremonial Moderator - the wino
Moderator Emeritus - Beave
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Craig

📌 ๐Ÿˆ Michigan at Minnesota*
📌 To register, email victardgoblue@gmail *

The Victors

Post a New Message

This pivots back to a point that I wanted to make yesterday in response to something that ny1995 made.

Posted on September 23, 2026 at 10:50:17 AM by GritsGoBlue

I agree with him that all of the ESPN content about prop bets tied to individual player performances is cheap and tawdry at best. At worst, it is leaning into a gambling epidemic that is ravaging their core audience. That said, I like the increasing use of betting lines in games because I will always trust the people with skin in the game over the talking heads. Professional opinion havers have little or no accountability. They'll make sweeping statements about teams, they'll turn out to be wrong, and then they move right along. Betting sites have the ultimate form of accountability in that they go out of business if they get their numbers wrong. If you have the Mandels of the world prattling on about how Michigan is going to lose to Iowa and you have a line that moved in Michigan's direction and has sat there, then it's good to have the line sitting their as a counter to the data-free content. I like that the odds have come out of the shadows and are now a prominent part of ESPN's coverage because they tell me more than whatever is tumbling out of Herbstreit's mouth.

Back to the board

Thread:

Log in to reply.

Probation ends …