I understand why Utah created the 'rhino' position. they were a QB-run oriented team with an elite OL coach
Posted on August 17, 2026 at 05:37:09 PM by 6p
that way you create an overload against weak P12 defenses and smash them and spring your QB for big gains.
But I hope coaches don't find it the hard way that you'll eventually end up needing good/elite TEs that Michigan has recently fielded. guys who aren't just blockers.
the hard games this year all have great-to-elite defenses. WR game can be contained.
We don't need Loveland . A Barner or a Marlin Klein can provide that extra dimension.
They ran the "rhino" formation >50% of the time. that will work against weak teams but i'm skeptical against the meat of the schedule we'll go up against.
MGoBlog guys think this is a 2015 like year and I kinda agree. The "rhino" will be an interesting thing to track this year.
Back to the board
Thread:
-
I understand why Utah created the 'rhino' position. they were a QB-run oriented team with an elite OL coach
- By 6p
August 17, 2026 at 05:37:09 PM
-
Had my fill of gimmick crap with RichRod and Borges. Just give me good players playing good football. Run the ball when you want to run. Stop the run when you have to. That’s it.**
- By xcheck
August 17, 2026 at 09:15:35 PM
-
MgoBlog pilled *
- By crumbs
August 17, 2026 at 08:34:06 PM
-
I like having it as an option. Teams have been building to play passing spreads for so long that you occasionally meet up with an undersized defense and you can mash em. See Nebraska 2025, Penn State 2023, and Michigan 2019.*
- By Bluebuck
August 17, 2026 at 07:21:53 PM
-
I would think the rhino would be limited use. He has inherited good TE in Hansen, Marshall. Use them*
- By Rich
August 17, 2026 at 06:51:42 PM
-
Doesn’t substantially change your point, but they were playing weak B12 Ds last year, not weak P12 Ds***
- By Craig
August 17, 2026 at 05:41:06 PM
Log in to reply.