Rules:
  1. Rule 1.
  2. Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
  3. Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
  4. Don't be a Tom Izzo.

Admins - Rich, BBA, Nikos
Ceremonial Moderator - the wino
Moderator Emeritus - Beave
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Craig

📌 šŸˆ Michigan at Minnesota*
📌 To register, email victardgoblue@gmail *

The Victors

Post a New Message

For some reason Larkin was a guy who had star buzz around himra from the beginning of his career in a way that Trammell didn't T

Posted on September 2, 2026 at 02:05:24 PM by Paul

Maybe it had something to do with the way that Trammell and Whitaker were always thought of together, I don't know. But Larkin got tons of media attention during his career, much more so than Trammell did. It's not the size of the media market, which would explain this in the context of a NYC or LA or Chicago player, it's something else.

I think the Morris explanation is very implausible.

It just occurs to me that Kirk Gibson got the Larkin treatment, but he was only good for about five seasons, so he's not at all in the same category of HOF quality as the two shortstops. Really it would be hard to find a player more comparable to another than Larkin to Trammell. Except Whitaker, who is even more comparable if you don't discount much for the position difference.

Back to the board

Thread:

Log in to reply.

Probation ends …