For some reason Larkin was a guy who had star buzz around himra from the beginning of his career in a way that Trammell didn't T
Posted on September 2, 2026 at 02:05:24 PM by Paul
Maybe it had something to do with the way that Trammell and Whitaker were always thought of together, I don't know. But Larkin got tons of media attention during his career, much more so than Trammell did. It's not the size of the media market, which would explain this in the context of a NYC or LA or Chicago player, it's something else.
I think the Morris explanation is very implausible.
It just occurs to me that Kirk Gibson got the Larkin treatment, but he was only good for about five seasons, so he's not at all in the same category of HOF quality as the two shortstops. Really it would be hard to find a player more comparable to another than Larkin to Trammell. Except Whitaker, who is even more comparable if you don't discount much for the position difference.
Back to the board
Thread:
-
For your consideration: Alan Trammell vs Barry Larkin.
- By brick
September 2, 2026 at 01:25:04 PM
-
Baseball has been very good to me - JOSE RIJO*
- By Cincywolve
September 2, 2026 at 02:27:47 PM
-
Great stats but your conclusion is asinine
- By Rich
September 2, 2026 at 01:32:18 PM
-
If Morris's fame hurt Trammell, it was all after he had left the Tigers and pitched with the Twins. That's his most "famous" time- when he pitched a CG shutout vs. the Braves in the WS.*
- By mjhollen
September 2, 2026 at 03:59:58 PM
-
For some reason Larkin was a guy who had star buzz around himra from the beginning of his career in a way that Trammell didn't T
- By Paul
September 2, 2026 at 02:05:24 PM
-
Disagree with your assessment of the media perception, both contemporaneously and subsequently
- By brick
September 2, 2026 at 02:02:09 PM
-
Following up, here are the Tigers of the Year from 78-92 (Tiger MVP voted by local media)
- By Rich
September 2, 2026 at 01:53:24 PM
-
The first tier was smaller than that: Gibson, Tram, Morris. And of that group Morris was the most celebrated during the pre-analytics era. Agree that brickās conclusion was a reach, tho**
- By Brad
September 2, 2026 at 01:43:22 PM
-
Parrish was more celebrated than Gibson nationally. Even locally. Gibson never made an All Star game. Parrish was the best catcher in the AL for a few years*
- By Rich
September 2, 2026 at 01:46:03 PM
-
Not true. Gibson was 6th in MVP voting in 1984 (4th among position players). Parrish was 16th. Also, Gibsonās WAR shouldnāt even have had him in the top-15. Tramās was 6.8 that year (he arguably should have been AL MVP). Gibson got more attention from fans/the media b/c he was a charismatic ā¦
- By Brad
September 2, 2026 at 01:53:19 PM
-
Gibson had charisma and local following but OTOH Parrish was an 8 time All Star and Gibson was selected zero times. So how well was he really viewed?*
- By Rich
September 2, 2026 at 01:59:47 PM
-
The options for all star catchers in the AL in the 80s were unusually shitty: Rich German, Terry Kennedy, Matt fāin Nokes, Tim Laudner, Terry Steinbaxh, etc. Meanwhile Gibson was competing with Reggie Jackson, Winfield, Puckett, Rickey Henderson, Jim Rice, Canseco, Bainesā¦**
- By Brad
September 2, 2026 at 02:28:22 PM
-
Disagree, perception was that Morris was a big game pitcher and a bulldog which over shadowed the actual stats. That was local and national.*
- By MasterBates
September 2, 2026 at 01:42:35 PM
Log in to reply.