Definitely needed lower risk but taking deep shots is as good as a punt. And we would have had single coverage on at least one WR....

Posted on September 13, 2026 at 01:21:00 PM by Rich

usually Marsh. They started to cheat a safety up to on Buchanan's side but Marsh was single covered. I guess a safety could have read pass and dropped back on him but OU was cheating up on the run. I think we could have hit a couple deep plays.

That is really what Bo did. Run heavy, ran the QB, but there were always deep balls to Jim Smith, Anthony Carter, Kolesar, etc until we started using real offenses.

Back to the board

Thread:

On rewatch: Underwood’s decision-making was *so* much better, passing and in the run game… - By Craig September 13, 2026 at 01:11:19 PM
- 72 grade on PFF, 2nd highest on offense behind Hiter. It was a solid game. It was encouraging, the light looked to be flickering on in the run game - By Daytripper September 13, 2026 at 01:13:54 PM
  - lol behind hiters 6 yards on 8 carries. I know he did some great things in the passing game and had a run called back but that’s funny.* - By WOK September 13, 2026 at 01:15:37 PM
    - PFF is better than nothing but the way PFF works - By Rich September 13, 2026 at 01:17:37 PM
      - Clearly “steals ball from QB on option plays” doesn’t factor into their grading* - By WOK September 13, 2026 at 01:30:21 PM
    - PFF is sorta like Funky's charts that way, they try and parse out the results of the other 10 guys on each play, not easy* - By Daytripper September 13, 2026 at 01:17:31 PM
- I don't like the conclusion (not just you) that 'it worked'. It absolutely did not work. We got zero points in the 2nd half from the offense unless we count a 6 yard drive* - By Rich September 13, 2026 at 01:13:06 PM
  - Now to be known as the 6 yard covid year drive. * - By django September 13, 2026 at 01:24:30 PM
    - Hill won the game for us. An example of the duality of football - By Rich September 13, 2026 at 01:55:33 PM
  - Just that it worked in that we won the game. But I agree, it was overly risky-averse… - By Craig September 13, 2026 at 01:17:33 PM
    - Definitely needed lower risk but taking deep shots is as good as a punt. And we would have had single coverage on at least one WR.... - By Rich September 13, 2026 at 01:21:00 PM
  - yea see my conclusion above. It worked against OU, it will likely not work against better teams* - By Daytripper September 13, 2026 at 01:14:27 PM
    - Without the Hill pick, it is 2/1 we lose that game* - By Rich September 13, 2026 at 01:15:18 PM

The Victors

Definitely needed lower risk but taking deep shots is as good as a punt. And we would have had single coverage on at least one WR....