A WMU-UM hypothetical that shows how crazy the “protocol” statement is
Posted on September 17, 2026 at 08:46:25 AM by ny1995
Imagine the official on the field had gotten the call correct to begin with. Clock showed 0:01. They stop the clock on time. Michigan is lining up for another shot.
They certainly would have stopped to review the clock. And the Oversight Committee is saying they should have used the inaccurate feed in the TV broadcast to overturn the correct call and declare the game over.
Back to the board
Thread:
-
A WMU-UM hypothetical that shows how crazy the “protocol” statement is
- By ny1995
September 17, 2026 at 08:46:25 AM
-
Why not just do what we do for basketball?
- By Triskal
September 17, 2026 at 10:29:05 AM
-
"The TV told me the game was over." It's the only argument they need.*
- By LS&Play
September 17, 2026 at 09:39:59 AM
-
The Michigan outrage is so tiring, front-center for the last three years, and always on low simmer for perpetuity.
- By BigLake
September 17, 2026 at 09:33:38 AM
-
Right - the TV feed is the actual reality
- By syrfan
September 17, 2026 at 09:31:47 AM
-
If this were a purely logical debate …
- By ny1995
September 17, 2026 at 09:18:56 AM
-
Insane. “Everyone, ignore your lying eyes that shows :01 on the stadium clock. The NBC broadcast clock says 0:00, so the game is over.”*
- By LKLIII
September 17, 2026 at 08:49:41 AM
-
Change that to a game in Columbus and the ball's on the one. Dead officials.*
- By ftb
September 17, 2026 at 08:48:25 AM
Log in to reply.