Rules:
  1. Rule 1.
  2. Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
  3. Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
  4. Don't be a Tom Izzo.

Admins - Rich, BBA, Nikos
Ceremonial Moderator - the wino
Moderator Emeritus - Beave
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Craig

📌 🏈 Michigan at Minnesota*
📌 To register, email victardgoblue@gmail *

The Victors

Post a New Message

I’ve heard the official clock and stadium clock are different plenty of times. Agree it’s fishy, after the game I thought it was bullshit. But then the video came out.

Posted on September 6, 2026 at 10:40:29 PM by plug (edited September 6, 2026 at 10:45:10 PM)

Hence my confusion about the claim. The Big Ten said their review used the official clock (whatever the hell that is). If you use that video and nothing else (no emotion, no preconceived notion, just the review video) they obviously and conclusively made the right call. There is 0.0 judgment in that decision. Foot out of bounds? Conclusive. Player touches ball? Conclusive. Time still on clock? Conclusive.

So my question, what is the claim?

1. The Big Ten doctored the clock image so the replay official would grant Michigan a second Hail Mary?

2. The Big Ten doctored the video to support a cheated call?

3. Incompetence happened that had the Big Ten replay review a play and clock that were out of synch?

4. Michigan cheated because Michigan cheats.

Back to the board

Thread:

Log in to reply.

Probation ends …