Rules:
  1. Rule 1.
  2. Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
  3. Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
  4. Don't be a Tom Izzo.

Admins - Rich, BBA, Nikos
Ceremonial Moderator - the wino
Moderator Emeritus - Beave
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Craig

📌 🏈 Michigan at Minnesota*
📌 To register, email victardgoblue@gmail *

The Victors

Post a New Message

If Michigan doesn't want to help develop QBs over 3-5 seasons and wants to focus on 1-2 year QB rentals then it should commit to that strategy. But a fan saying "Bryce will never be the quarterback we hoped" is arrogant nonsense.

Posted on September 9, 2026 at 10:00:52 AM by Rose Bowl Champion (edited September 9, 2026 at 10:17:52 AM)

In the past 10 years, we've seen a lot of QBs improve dramatically as upperclassmen in a different system/scheme with new coaches.

But somehow Bryce Underwood is some impenetrable, irredeemable conundrum because Michigan™ Football and mediocre QB play go hand-in-hand while the rest of college football continually adapts upwards? I categorically reject such an opinion.

2023 Michigan supposedly had a dominant run attack but it didn't even break 2700 rushing yards (even after going nuclear on the mediocre Washington defense). To contextualize this, consider the following: 2025 Indiana (in 1 additional game) had 3400+ rushing yards.


Michigan should modernize its offense. Imagine if Ed Orgeron had foolishly continued to run the same Michigan/Schembechler-coded, run-oriented offense of the Les Miles era into 2019.

We would've never seen the record-breaking, ultra explosive 2019 LSU offense.

Michigan's desire to over-emphasize the run simply because of decades of tradition has held Michigan back and will continue to hold Michigan back until we change. (And Jim Harbaugh is a 1 of 1.) Bryce should be operating in 11 personnel and pinging passes all over the field.

Additionally, does anyone think 2019 LSU wasn't physical™ because it passed the ball? No. If anything, LSU's run game improved significantly because defenses were forced to defend the entire field which made it easier to run in the box out of LSU's RPO offense.

Back to the board

Thread:

Log in to reply.

Probation ends …