Rules:
  1. Rule 1.
  2. Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
  3. Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
  4. Don't be a Tom Izzo.

Admins - Rich, BBA, Nikos
Ceremonial Moderator - the wino
Moderator Emeritus - Beave
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Craig

📌 ๐Ÿˆ Michigan at Minnesota*
📌 To register, email victardgoblue@gmail *

The Victors

Post a New Message

BBA, I agree. I have very high hopes for Bryce Underwood but I can't look past how Michigan has played football for decades: it essentially deemphasizes QB play.

Posted on September 9, 2026 at 10:11:20 AM by Rose Bowl Champion (edited September 9, 2026 at 10:27:54 AM)

In my reply to Cincywolve, I pointed out that Coach Jim Harbaugh's approach to football (which was reminiscent of risk-averse Schembechler football) didn't accumulate impressive stats for a variety of reasons.

Coach Harbaugh's strategy worked because he was reinforced by a generational defense. We can't expect to have a generational defense every season. Even Nick Saban in the pre-NIL and pre-Transfer Portal era had only 2 ultra elite defenses: 2011 and 2016 Alabama. And the latter learned even a generational defense wasn't enough to beat a high-powered Clemson offense led by an electric, playmaking QB.

Ohio State adapted
USC adapted
Texas adapted
Oklahoma adapted (and was known for powerful rushing attack out of wishbone)
Alabama adapted (in fact Saban changed mid-dynasty in 2014 by hiring Lane Kiffin)

But somehow UM altering its approach screws with UM's precious "tradition" for the worse?

We keep squandering incredible talents at QB and relegating them to game managers. I'm repulsed by it.

Back to the board

Thread:

Log in to reply.

Probation ends …