Rules:
  1. Rule 1.
  2. Please use a "*" or "nm" in the subject line to denote topic only posts.
  3. Any post or attempt to take things "off the board" will result in a ban. Do not use other poster's real names or personal info.
  4. Don't be a Tom Izzo.

Admins - Rich, BBA, Nikos
Ceremonial Moderator - the wino
Moderator Emeritus - Beave
Honorary Moderators - BigLake, Blue Man

POTY - Craig

📌 ๐Ÿˆ Michigan at Minnesota*
📌 To register, email victardgoblue@gmail *

The Victors

Post a New Message

Random soccer take: does anyone really need an elite striker anymore?

Posted on August 25, 2026 at 11:46:54 AM by GritsGoBlue

This might be a little coping with the fact that Barca are going to struggle to sign one before the season starts but they looked great in a striker-less system on Sunday. PSG have won their first two European cups using a striker-less system. Spain have won the last two major international tournaments when their striker has been the weakest member of the starting XI. Arsenal just won the league while getting little from their expensive traditional striker and they look better when they play Kai Havertz, a false nine, in that role. It's useful to have one for specific tactical situations but is that specific position a bit of an appendix now, an organ that might have had importance in an earlier era but doesn't anymore?

Back to the board

Thread:

Log in to reply.

Probation ends …