Whitaker and Trammell were both underrated because so much of the credit that should’ve gone to them went to Morris
Posted on September 2, 2026 at 09:30:01 AM by brick
Trammell should’ve been an early ballot HOFer, but only got 16% of the vote in Y1 and never exceeded 41%. He had to get in the crappy Veterans Committee way even though he was an obvious HOFer (between the 8th and 10th best SS ever). Compare his candidacy to Barry Larkin’s, who got 50% in Y1 and HOF inclusion in Y3. Larkin was fortunate he didn’t play much of his career on a team with a wildly overrated starting pitcher who got credit for Larkin’s defense. Morris, a guy who has an unambiguously worse case than contemporaries who nobody voted for like Ron Guidry, Orel Hersheiser, Frank Viola and Bret Saberhagen, got 22% of the vote in Y1 and reached 67.7% one year! What the actual fuck?
There’s a cost to glazing a mid starter. The 80s Tigers were a heavily covered team; they weren’t overlooked. Somebody was going to get the credit, and unfortunately that was Jack Morris.
Back to the board
Thread:
-
Jack Morris's top four seasons compared to some other pitchers' top four seasons:
- By brick
September 1, 2026 at 11:25:43 PM
-
I get the consternation on Morris but he won a ton of games and was very good in the postseason and won 3 titles. There are a lot of worse players in than Morris. What I always fall back on is
- By Rich
September 1, 2026 at 11:30:58 PM
-
Whitaker deserves before Morris*
- By detroitbry
September 2, 2026 at 12:49:21 AM
-
see even "big hall" guys don't want baines. I'm a Sox fan, he's HOVG, that's fine*
- By Daytripper
September 1, 2026 at 11:39:44 PM
-
Jack Morris's postseason stats: 13 starts, 7-4, 3.80 ERA, 1,245 WHIP, 2.0 K/BB. Compare that to Orel Hershiser:
- By brick
September 1, 2026 at 11:38:52 PM
-
It sucks. Him and Baines have zero case. The HOF voters normalized this shit for HOVG players with a narrative, and meanwhile numerous players more deserving (including steroid era) are out*
- By Daytripper
September 1, 2026 at 11:26:53 PM
Log in to reply.