They worked really well against Milroe. A lot of it is personnel and IMO position coaches
Posted on September 4, 2026 at 05:00:09 PM by Rich
(edited September 4, 2026 at 05:02:56 PM)
We had really shitty technical/tactical assistants on defense. Morgan, Jean-Mary, can't even remember the DL guy. When guys know the fundamentals, coordinators look really good.
Wink did confuse Williams of Washington and gave MSU fits. We did ok at OU. But at USC, a great talent like Barham was overrunning plays as were the safeties and LBs. That is not on the DC.
Back to the board
Thread:
-
My sense is (with no statistical deep dive to back it up) that Seth et al are not completely wrong about Wink…
- By Craig
September 4, 2026 at 04:48:41 PM
-
Seth was right, but it’s over. Jay hill is the dc. Move on*
- By ameriKa
September 4, 2026 at 09:48:01 PM
-
I think he was broadly correct but trips over his own dick when he tries getting too into the weeds and became obsessed with Wink*
- By LewisBullox
September 4, 2026 at 05:45:47 PM
-
There are completely objective ways to criticize Wink.
- By GritsGoBlue
September 4, 2026 at 05:32:15 PM
-
Wink's philosophy is pretty simplistic imo. and the way opponents punished his tendencies (USC game) was comical*
- By 6p
September 4, 2026 at 05:18:38 PM
-
It became comical how often his blitzes were immediately destroyed, often by a perfect play call. Either he sucks or he's really unlucky.*
- By jjwalker
September 4, 2026 at 04:55:10 PM
-
They worked really well against Milroe. A lot of it is personnel and IMO position coaches
- By Rich
September 4, 2026 at 05:00:09 PM
-
I think Seth was right about Wink in many ways and it led to Seth thinking that Wink was 100% awful at everything.
- By Bluebuck
September 4, 2026 at 04:52:01 PM
-
He sucked. Seth is right on the merits and extremely wrong on how he made the case. (nm)
- By suede
September 4, 2026 at 04:49:21 PM
Log in to reply.